Tag Archives: tantalum short

HP 3562A Signal Analyzer: a broken display and an easy fix

Recently, during some phase noise measurements, my 3562A failed. This instrument is an essential part of the noise test set, it is used for all frequency offsets up to 100 kHz, and as a signal/noise source (the 3562A has a fairly capable built-in noise source, signal source, etc.).
While the communication via GPIB went well and I could still complete the test job, the CRT went dark with no sign of life. I also have a second unit, with a LCD display, but the 3562A of the phase noise test set still has its original CRT. Let’s hope we can fix it because I don’t want to invest in a new LCD or anything for this purpose.

So I opened up the box (fortunately, it is accessible on top of the test set which is a stack of instruments, maybe 250 kgs of electronics), and did some checks. As it turns out, one of the rails of the CRT driver boards is down.

Some years back I had already replaced some tantalums, maybe some more of these have gone bad? So I cut some wires at suspicious capacitors – you can normally do this no problem, because the instrument will still function even with some buffer caps missing.

In fact, after the 3rd cut, the rail came back. The tantalum had a full short but no sign of smoke or heat, probably, because of various protection circuits of the power supply.

Replaced it with a similar electrolytic cap, probably this will do. It is a question of repair philosophy, should you replace all tantalums in such device, if you found two defective caps? I decided not to, because the fix every 5 years is easy enough, and there are just too many tantalums in it, moreover, I may break some contacts or cause issues with electrostatic discharge. For the current repair, I didn’t even remove the board, just cut the capacitor from the top and solder the spare back, from the top. As some old laser engineer told me once, the less you touch it, the better it will work. Sure enough, if the objective is to bring the unit back to the best state of reliability, it would be best just to replace the whole CRT by a new LCD assembly, or by a few 100 USD worth of KEMET high-rel tantalums and do a 5 hour solder and disassembly/assembly job…

HP 8642A Signal Generator: To be, or not to be a parts unit

The HP 8642A is the cheaper brother (or sister) of the 8642B (see here, I have two of the 8642B around and still use them quite a lot, one in Japan, one in Germany), it is essentially the same unit, but the “B” has a built-in doubler to effectively double the frequency range. The 8642A works up to 1057 MHz, good enough for most HAM purposes. It has all the desirable HP high frequency goodies inside, including, a set of precision 140 dB attenuators, and a huge number of parts that would come in handy for repair of other RF gear, everything of highest quality, low noise transistor, high reliability tantalums, a box of cables and connectors, and at least 20 kg of case aluminum. So, I did not hesitate to buy this unit for the scrap price of the aluminum contained. It also has a low distortion modulation source, which is also very useful, and has a may high quality relais and opamps.

The unit is somewhat dirty, seems it had been sitting in some storage room for a while, and looking at the fan inside, it also has seen some hours of operation (which is not necessarily a bad thing).
The front frame has a mechanical damage, some part is missing – fortunately, no damage to the front panel. But I have some spare HP System II frames, let’s see.

Strangely enough, one module is quite shiny, the case aluminum had some other surface treatment – also, it has a later date code (1989), compared to the other units (1985-87). Upon close inspection of the connectors there are slight scratches – seems this module has been replaced. The 8642A had a field repair program based on module exchange (even the specs were guaranteed after such exchange), quite likely that this module had failed after a couple years of service.

After a quick power up test – nothing to report, the unit is not powering up at all. Took all the panels off, and checked the voltages – nothing present. Checking around the rectifiers and capacitors – all is good here, but the voltage regulators (+-5.2 V, +-15 V, and +-50 V) won’t start up, even when I try to force them. Checked the rails – disconnected the cable (ribbon cable) from the supply assy (A17) to the power distribution board. The 15 V line has a hard 0 Ohms short!

15 Minutes later – checked each module. And the shiny one has the short! A bad 10 uF Tantalum (25 V rated, running at 15 V – should usually be good enough). Replaced it with a 15 uF, 25 V Kemet – no 10 uF Tantalums here in my Japan workshop.

Still, before we proceed, let’s be careful with the power supply. Not that it starts up, and has some issues, and all the modules are gone. Easier said than done – there are sense wires going to the power distribution board, and, a ground sense wire going to the rectifier board (A18). I didn’t bother to study the schematic and notes too precisely, there it says: sense ground, connected to a screw and to the chassis. Of course, I had removed this screw, and now wonding why the supply won’t work…

That’s how this screw and trace looks on the schematic.

Fixed it with a jumper wire, still no success.

Fortunately, only minor trouble, a dead Zener in the 15 V crowbar (using a Zener-Thyristor-SCR circuit, marked red below). And, by design of the supply, if the 15 V is dead, all supplies stop.

After this fix, the supply is starting up, and all voltages are accurate to 5 mV, with no adjustments… this is real quality. And with the supply, the unit is starting up, and passing the start up self test, and even the extended self test (preset-shift-330-Hz), no issues.

Not so high quality are the elastomeric materials used – two kind of foam, one of low density, which completly desintegrated to a black glue like substance (same applies to the 8642Bs I have, so it is a material age issue, not related to the storage or use condition). First, scratching off all the old stuff with a credit card. The bottom cover was a mess, so I don’t show pictures (couldn’t touch the camera with the gloves).

Everything cleaned off. Below, these are the craps (including a chocolate bar cover, which you will need after this messy work).

The new foam pieces (not shown), were all cut to the precise shapes, and mounted with double-side tape (carpet tape).

There will be some further repairs needed (the backlight is not working, and I need to get a good front frame from my German junk pile), but some initial tests were done. Phase noise is good, at least as much as I can check, vs. a 8662A, tested at some random frequencies (10 and 56-odd below).

Note, at above 10 kHz, the 8662A has higher phase noise than the 8642A, so the test can only show the overall function and absence of phase noise issues (for the 8642A) above these frequencies.

There are issues with the attenuators. And flatness, see below. Even with a rather crude spectrum analyzer as flatness indicator, all within 1 dB easily, over the full span.

All in all, still a good unit, and I won’t yet use it for parts and spares.

Micro-Tel MSR-902C Microwave Surveillance Receiver: power back on – first signs of (extraterrestrial?) life

Today, a few spare MJ12002 transistors arrived. No time to lose, and put them into the power supply. Note that the new transistors are 1983 data code, whereas the Micro-Tel originals were 1988… fixing the power supply with old parts, but no reason to assume that these transistors have any issues with age. With such power supplies, I would always suggest to use a pair of transistors of the same manufacturer, rather than mixing up two very different devices. This is why both transistors were replaced, not just the defective part.

msr-902c 8322 mj12002

After this replacement, connected a 10 Ohms 25 Watts load resistor, and grounded the Interlock and ON/OFF lines. When powering up, the green AC ON light comes on, but not for too long. Look at the set of fuses sacrificed in the process:

msr-902c pwr supply rep fuses

Another set of tests – no issues found, all working fine. Something must be loading the power supply, and I can’t get any negative voltages out of it – but there must be at least one negative rail to provide -15 V to the various opamps in the receiver.

Not to long and the culprit was found – a shorted tantalum, a T310 series Kemet tantalum, directly at the – what turned out to be, -18 V output. Check out the date code. Why did Micro-Tel put a 1979, week 38 dated device, in such kind of expensive and specialized equipment (other parts suggest that this unit was made about 1989, at a price of about $40-50k – that’s about $70k in today’s dollars…).

msr-902c tantalum

Some tests show that there is a +18 V, -18 V, and a +12 V output. All are routed through feed-through capacitors. A fair bit of effort, and cost!

msr-902c pwr supply output

First test with the actual receiver connected –

msr-902c first pwr test

– connected the 1-18 GHz tuner – a bit of a cable mess.

msr-902c test setup

To test the basic functions, like, IF chain, detectors, etc, a 1.5 GHz test signal from a HP 8642B was routed to the tuner. And, to my greatest satisfaction, the MSR-902C is actually receiving!

msr-902c receiving 1.5ghz

1 kHz AM modulation…

msr-902 receiving am

… also tested the FM and AM detectors, both in sweep and fixed modes, the AFC, the IF gain, the marker – all working. Also the 8-12 GHz, and 12-18 GHz ranges, working fine. Clear signal down to -105 dBm input. So all working and pretty well tune.

msr-902c 8 to12 range

Unfortunatly, this is not the case for the 2 to 8 GHz ranges – the frequency display is not showing a reasonable value – not sure what is going on here. Maybe something with the band logic, or the signal multiplexers (see the MSR-904A repair story – these instruments are notorious for defective CMOS multiplexers).

msr-902c 2 to 8 ghz ranges defect

So far, so good – at least in some bands, we would receive satellites, or signals from other galaxies, given, there aren’t many strong sources out there, in space, and all the other solar systems, too far away!